Sustainable Funding and Policy Workgroup Strategy Prioritization Survey

Please rank the following statements relating to the strategies of the Sustainable Funding and Policy Workgroup using the points system.

1. The strategy is Achievable

3pts = Easily Achieveable

2pts = Requires New Resources

1pt = Major policy or systems change needed

2. The strategy is Timely

3pts = Strategy can be achieved quickly

2pts = Is needed for staging- other strategies depend on this happening first

1pt = Long or difficult timeline to complete the strategy

3. The strategy is Impactful on Client lives

3pts = High Impact (Significant/makes a positive difference for those impacted, improves access for clients, improves health outcomes, reduces disparities, etc)

2pts = Broad Impact (impacts many people or systems; statewide)

1pt = Limited or no impact

4. The strategy is Impactful on on Billing/reimbursement

3pts = High Impact (large increase in billing opportunity)

2pts = Broad Impact (statewide, cross sector, many affected)

1pt = Limited or no impact

5. We have the Capacity (i.e. people and resources) to compete the strategy

3pts = We have the people in place and the resources

2pts = Requires minor investment in people or resources

1pt = Significant people and resources needed

6. The strategy improves the Billing process

3pts = Increases billing from existing billing providers

2pts = New billing providers

1pt = Requires policy change

 7. The strategy enhances Reimbursement

3pts = Removes barriers (billing guidelines, rules, enrollment, workflow, easy to understand etc.)

2pts = Facilitates smooth reimbursement process (straightforward, not time consuming, effective, etc)

1pt = Requires policy change

8. The strategy enhances other Financing Mechanisms

3pts = The strategy is replicable, sustainable (ongoing mechanism)

2pts = Widely available (open to many sectors)

1pt = Requires policy change